Blue Raven intelligence website letter logo

When to Say No to Client Requests – Protecting Security Operation Integrity

When to Say No to Client Requests - Protecting Security Operation Integrity
Navigating client requests while preserving security integrity is key. Saying no when necessary safeguards both clients and operations.
Share :
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

 Security professionals are entrusted with the critical task of protecting individuals, organizations, assets, and operations. Each one plays an important role in ensuring that security standards and protocols are followed, thereby minimizing vulnerabilities and risks. However, in the complex world of security and dealing with different clientele, professionals often face a challenging dilemma – when to say no to client requests.

   Many of us have found ourselves in the difficult position of either denying a client’s request because it would compromise operational security or having to comply because we were forced to. When your employment is on the line and your ability to take care of your family is at risk, being able to say NO to a client’s requests is even more difficult than one can imagine. And that is what we want to discuss in this article, how to delicately balance meeting client demands while still protecting security operation integrity.

 The Dilemma of Client Requests.

 Security professionals regularly encounter client requests that may conflict with established security protocols, jeopardize security, or add more risks. These requests can range from relaxed access control (how many of you have been asked to overlook a client’s friend), to use an unarmed executive protection agent for a detail that requires armed ones, to placing fewer agents than what the actual threat level requires, to sharing sensitive information with external parties. Some clients may request changes to physical security measures, such as leaving doors unlocked or disabling alarm systems during specific hours. Others might ask for surveillance cameras to be turned off or specific areas to be excluded from monitoring. While some clients, in an attempt to reduce costs, may request security tasks to be outsourced to lower-cost providers who may not meet the same security standards. They may even downplay the results of threat assessments, insisting on fewer security personnel or reduced security measures, even when the assessment recommends otherwise. And lastly, some clients may request security professionals to disregard compliance requirements or regulations in favor of expediency. As you can see, the pressure to be able to accommodate clients’ requests and maintaining positive relationships can be immense for a security professional.

   Before we start blaming clients for their irrational requests, we must take into consideration the reasons that they make them and understand that these reasons are crucial for every security professional to effectively address and deal with.

Things to consider:

  • Client’s Lack of Security Awareness: Client may not fully comprehend the security implications of their requests. They might underestimate the risks associated with certain actions or be unaware of best security practices. They do not know what you know, and they do not understand the risks or the threat levels.
  • Personal Beliefs: Some clients, although they may need protection, have a very different view on how to achieve protection. Many despise the use of firearms and will require only unarmed protective details, even when the situation or environment absolutely requires armed agents.
  • Cost and Budget Constraints: Clients and/or companies often operate under budget constraints and may seek cost-saving measures. Many have to wait for the quarterly budget discussions to decide which security measures they will utilize. Some may request compromises in security to reduce expenses, even if it means sacrificing security standards. Additionally, it’s important to keep in mind that in some situations, you may be dealing with a client or a company that is hiring security solely to comply with regulations.
  • Convenience and Efficiency: One of the things that we have to fight with as security professionals is client’s resistance to changing or altering how they do things in life. Some simply resist needed change because they do not want the ‘’inconvenience’’ that comes with making changes, even though those changes are to make them safer. Some clients will prioritize convenience and efficiency over security.
  • Misplaced Trust: Clients may have misplaced trust in their own judgment or believe that they have a better understanding of their security needs than the security professionals. How many of you have had to work with a client who “knew better than you”? Others, due to their bad prior experience with other security teams, have lost faith in security professionals and won’t take into consideration any of your recommendations. It is easier to work with a client who is new to utilizing security teams than with someone who is used to bad practices from their previous ones.
  • Pressure from Stakeholders or Family Members: Clients might face pressure from their own stakeholders, such as senior executives or board members, to prioritize business objectives over security. Sometimes they may be facing pressure from their own family members who are complaining about your presence (the wife or the children who see your presence as an intrusion on their personal space and want you to stay away).
  • Unforeseen Circumstances: Sometimes client requests may arise from unexpected events or emergencies, leading to decisions made in a hurry without considering the overall security implications.
  • Cultural or Organizational Differences: Clients from different cultural backgrounds or organizations may have varying perspectives on security and risk tolerance. This can lead to misunderstandings and conflicting expectations. Cultural differences should be considered when dealing with foreign clients.
  • Lack of Communication: In some cases, clients and security professionals may not have open lines of communication, leading to misunderstandings and clients making requests without a full understanding of the potential consequences. Some agents show fear when having to deal with their clients and many will avoid discussing matters with them because they believe if they do so, they will irritate the client.
  • Client-Priority Conflict: Clients may prioritize their specific needs and objectives over broader security concerns. They might not fully grasp how their requests have an enormous impact on the overall security operation. Sometimes what is important for us, as their security team, is not as important for the clients.

The Impact on Security Operation Integrity Yielding to Client Requests.

Now we all want to take care of our clients and provide that high customer service; however, we must be able to balance their requests. Compromises can lead to vulnerabilities, breaches, or lapses in security, resulting in harmful situations for our client and our security teams as well as assets loss, embarrassing situations, damage to the organization’s reputation etc. While it may seem like a short-term solution and avoiding conflict by going along with a client’s request, we should not forget that it can have profound implications for the overall integrity of security operations, and our careers.  

Balancing Clients’ Requests and Operational Integrity (and Safety).

First, it is very important for a security professional to be able to recognize potential red flags when it comes to client requests. Critical thinking and evaluating the client’s rationale are essential skills. If a request compromises security, it should raise concerns and it must be addressed in the proper manner as soon as possible. Something to highlight is, there is a difference between accommodating a request that is just requiring more work from us or is ‘’inconvenient”, and a request that compromises operational security and integrity. Seeing and understanding the difference is important.

   Communication here is vital! Security professionals should be able to explain the necessity of security measures without alienating clients. Effective communication can lead to a better understanding of security concerns and, in some cases, help clients reconsider their requests. Use clear and understandable language so your client can understand what you are trying to convey. Keep it short and to the point. Explain to your client what consequences his request may have on operational security and what additional risks they may cause with their requests. Developing negotiation skills can also be valuable, as finding compromises that maintain security while addressing client concerns is often possible. An open dialogue between security professionals and clients can lead to mutually beneficial outcomes. Before you present your disagreement, make sure you have listened to your client. It is important they feel their wants or concerns have been considered and thought of before being rejected.

   If you can, find and present alternatives. Instead of simply saying “no” to a client request, offer alternative solutions that can address their needs while maintaining security. Provide options that strike a balance between security and client objectives.

   If needed, use case studies and examples to illustrate why you are saying no to this specific request and how it can affect the client’s and operational safety by compromising. Some people learn better from examples, so use those real-world examples or case studies to illustrate the impact of security compromises. Use analogies and analogical reasoning. Sometimes, using analogies or analogical reasoning can simplify complex security concepts for clients. Relate security measures to everyday situations they can relate to, making it easier for them to comprehend. Remember, they are not your enemy, they just don’t know as much about security as you do.

   Do a risk assessment of your client’s latest request and present the findings to him. This allows clients to see the specific threats and vulnerabilities that he or his organization face and what additional risks complying to his requests may add, thus making it easier for them to grasp the need for stringent security measures. Be transparent about the decision-making process. Explain how security protocols are determined and why they are in place. Clients are more likely to understand and respect security decisions when they see a transparent and logical approach.

   If you can, educate clients about the importance of security protocols and standards. Help them understand the potential risks and consequences associated with certain requests. Emphasize the legal and regulatory requirements by highlighting the obligations that the organization must adhere to. Explain that non-compliance can result in severe penalties, legal issues, and damage to the company’s reputation. This can help clients appreciate the necessity of security measures. Sometimes they may care more about their name and reputation than their safety. Use that to your advantage.

   Maintain constant professional behavior and build trust. Clients will likely agree to the suggestions of a security professional they trust and respect as an authoritative figure. Foster a trusting relationship with clients by consistently delivering on security promises and being responsive to their concerns. This can go a long way in convincing clients to trust your judgment on security matters.

Drawing The Line.

Many security practitioners will ask ‘’OK, so where do I draw the line?”. And there is no one answer to this question as every situation, client, threat level and security professional are different. Where one might draw the line, someone else may be more flexible and vice versa. In the end it all comes down to your risk and threat assessment and knowing your own client. Evaluate each request and how that will affect your operational security and integrity and decide accordingly. And do not forget documentation! Maintain detailed records of security decisions, risk assessments, and client interactions. Documentation can serve as evidence of due diligence and provide a basis for explaining decisions to clients. And it may just save your job! In the world of security, saying no, when necessary, is a hallmark of professionalism. Security professionals play a critical role in protecting individuals and their organizations from a myriad of threats. Upholding security operation integrity is not just a duty; it’s your responsibility. As you try to balance clients’ requests and operational safety, remember that the decisions you make today can have far-reaching consequences. Say no when you must, and in doing so, safeguard the future of your organization.

More Articles

WE PROVIDE EXECUTIVE SECURITY SERVICES FOR

YOUR SAFETY NEEDS MATTER

With Blue Raven Inc., you won’t get the same generic security plans everyone else receives. Our team will create a uniquely designed and most suitable security strategy to protect you and what matters to you.